Andrew Gabriel wrote: > Youri Podchosov wrote: >> StarOffice 9 Beta installed on OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_96 X86 >> >> $ /opt/staroffice9/program/soffice >> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: libuno_sal.so.3: open failed: No such file or >> directory >> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: relocation error: file >> /opt/staroffice9/program/soffice.bin: symbol sal_detail_initialize: >> referenced symbol not found >> ./soffice[131]: wait: 4618: Killed >> >> $ find /opt/openoffice.org /opt/staroffice9 -name 'libuno*' -ls >> 5719 643 -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 533940 Jun 27 07:19 >> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0/program/libunoxmlsi.so >> 4572 102 -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 103184 Jun 27 09:49 >> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0/program/libunopkg.so >> >> This libuno_sal.so is not in the StarOffce 9 Beta distribution >> (so-9-beta-bin-solia-en-US.sh ), although it's present in StarOffice 8. So, >> how is it supposed to work? Thanks >> > > I installed staroffice 9 beta on Nevada snv_96 from > so-9-beta-bin-solia-en-US_de_es_fr_it_sv_pt-BR_nl_hu_pl_pt_ru.sh > It looks to me like it contains the packages from which libuno* files come. > > The SVR4 package names are below: > > $ grep libuno /var/sadm/install/contents > /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0/program/libunopkg.so f none 0444 root bin > 103184 15505 1214574552 ooobasis30-core02 > /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0/program/libunoxmlsi.so f none 0444 root bin > 533940 51701 1214565574 ooobasis30-core05 > /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_cppu.so.3 f none 0444 root bin 213368 > 51430 1214299918 openofficeorg-ure > /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_cppuhelperC52.so.3 f none 0444 root > bin 1215476 49131 1214300020 openofficeorg-ure > /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_purpenvhelperC52.so.3 f none 0444 > root bin 19312 16297 1214299918 openofficeorg-ure > /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 f none 0444 root bin 1895516 > 54254 1214298594 openofficeorg-ure > /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_salhelperC52.so.3 f none 0444 root > bin 13792 27469 1214298676 openofficeorg-ure > $ > > These are part of the installation tarball I downloaded. > However, I haven't tried installing Staroffice 9 on OpenSolaris, and I > seem to have downloaded a different filename from you, so that's two > possible reasons for a difference in behaviour. >
Andrew, where did you get that file from? I'm starting SO9b download with this URL http://www.sun.com/so9beta_download and eventually I'm offered only files for separate languages, named like so-9-beta-bin-solia-ru.sh; the one that I have for English doesn't include those libs, didn't try other languages, though. Is there another packaging and download site? As to OSOL vs. Nevada, I don't think it matters, all libuno* stuff is a part of neither former nor latter, so it *must* be coming with SO itself, right? Thanks! -- /ynp _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
