On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24/09/2008, at 8:40 AM, Shawn Walker wrote: >> >> Jason King wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like a perfect use of the group packages ips provides. See >>>>>> ss-dev >>>>>> or >>>>>> gcc-dev as examples: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/manifest/0/[EMAIL >>>>>> PROTECTED],5.11-0.86:20080821T182448Z >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/manifest/0/[EMAIL >>>>>> PROTECTED],5.11-0.86:20080821T182448Z >>>>> >>>>> Can group packages depend upon other group packages, or is it 1 level >>>>> of indirection only? >>>> >>>> n-levels, as far as I know. If it doesn't work, I'd consider it a bug, >>>> so >>>> please file one. >>> >>> Excellent. How should I go about contributing this? Just create a >>> ticket w/ the package information? >> >> Open a ticket under distribution -> packaging as an enhancement. I'm >> not actually certain what the course of action will be from there. > > Seems like a good idea to me - the more people working daily on OpenSolaris > the better IMO. Just one request though, let's not create 'on-dev', and > instead go for something a little more descriptive like 'kernel-dev' :) > > > Glynn > >
I've created bug 3570 to track this. _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
