Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Nicolas Williams > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:39:21PM -0800, John Sonnenschein wrote: >>> On 18-Nov-08, at 2:21 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:09:30PM -0800, John Sonnenschein wrote: >>>>> That would be acceptable. I'd still prefer the code to be built on an >>>>> internal machine such that we have an exact record, but I'm willing >>>>> to >>>>> bend this far. >>>> I think you'd have to insist that it be [re-]built by "Sun employees >>>> on >>>> isolated machines" (certainly not just on SWAN!). >>>> >>>> For an open community I think that's likely too much. No? >>> Sorry, not Sun internal, but OpenSolaris internal/controlled. If >>> Dennis Clarke for example runs the machine and everyone decides that >>> he's trusted enough to run the build infrastructure, that's fine too >>> IMO, it's more about the controlled build environment. >> OK, so you want trusted builders only -- anyone can contribute spec >> files, or what have you, but only trusted builders can submit built >> pkgs. >> >> I think that can happen naturally with votes to begin with. We could >> start with that and see what happens. >> >> Alternatively we should hurry up with a spec file-based consolidation >> and go from there. That's a *big* change in direction, at least >> outwardly, though in a way that's exactly what JDS and pkgfactory are >> doing, so perhaps not such a big deal. >> >> Nico >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> indiana-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >> > > I agree with all Nico points. Spec file based submissions built in a > controlled machine.
...where applicable and possible. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
