Comments on the first 28 pages.

Page 8

        2009.06 is described as offering complete support for developing
web applications -- one type of application among many. Why exclude others?
        
Page 15

"package will be searched in the preferred publisher's repository catalog first" --> "package will be searched for in the preferred publisher's repository catalog first"

(This is also a forward reference to the term "repository catalog.")

Page 17

"...then it is searched for in the other configured publishers"
        --> "..then it is searched for in the other configured repositories"

Page 18

Dry-Run section

        Dry-run various spelled with a regular dash, an em-dash and no dash.

Page 19

Remove italics on 'amp' in first pfexec command. (why is this line repeated?)

This section would benefit from a brief explanation of the output from the -nv
        command or a pointer to where that information can be found.

Page 20

        How does "server" relate to the concepts of "publisher" or "repository?

Example 3-4. Does the '-l' mean 'local'? Would be clearer to mention this as
        is done in Example 3-5 with '-r'.

        Example 3-5. pkg example shown does not use '-r' switch

Example 3-6. What exactly is searched? In the returned results 'book' is part
        of a directory name, not a 'description'...

        Example 3-7. Another mention of 'server' here.

Page 23

Section on displaying state and version incorrectly says "Use the following
        command to uninstall existing packages" when introducing 'pkg list'.

Example 3-10. Does '-a' mean 'even if not installed'? if so, not consistent with
        pkg info's use of -r. if not, a description of -a would be useful.

Page 24

I find this concept of publisher to be very confusing. On page 15, the example FMRI describes 'opensolaris.org' as the publisher, but in the examples here publisher is not a host-like string. I see from the 2nd example that the
        publisher name can look host-like (opensolaris.org and sunfreeware.com)
        and in both cases the associated URL includes the publisher name. Is
        that required?

In addition, the concept of 'origin' is introduced here (origin_url and origin as
        a TYPE) but not defined.

        It would be very helpful if this could all be described more clearly.

        The How to Remove a Publisher Config increases the confusion by
stating that the argument to -O is a 'repository' rather than an 'origin_url.'

Page 25

It also does not help that the output of the 'pkg publisher' command labels (for example) http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release as a URL. It is a repository,
        yes? Or is it an origin-url? Or are they the same?

        How to Display Publishers: Says that publishers have associated URLs.
        Should this be associated repositories? (which may be represented as
        URLs?)

        








_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to