I agree with the views of Ms Padmini Raghavan
----- Original Message ---- From: Padmini Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: indiantreepix <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 29 September, 2008 10:57:33 PM Subject: [indiantreepix:5131] Re: Dipkadi montanum I am afraid it is becoming a fashion to send photos which are marvels of composition and colour and which would make stunning wall hangings. However as this is not primarily a photography site ( with exposure and lens details etc) maybe it would be better to show the whole plant or tree followed by it's individual parts so that everyone is able to enrich their knowledge of flora. I, for one, have had the thrill of recognising many previously unnamed plants and trees from the detailed views shown of the different parts of the plant or tree. This is not to detract from the artistic value of the pictures shown but to hope that the content would be more suitable to this site. Padmini Raghavan. On 9/26/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently several photos appeared showing only flowers or the inflorescens of the plants. Pl. try to include at least the leaves, if the whole plant can not be accommodated On Sep 26, 9:26 pm, "satish phadke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dipkadi montanum > A Liliaceae family member seen amongst a lot of Strbilanthus bushes on Kas > plateau. > Satish Phadke > > Dipkadi montanum.jpg > 189KViewDownload Share files, take polls, and make new friends - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
