Anand ji, thank you very much for your reply! Im pleased to hear your advice.
In Japan, Canon and Nikon is accepted by professional photographer (Canon looks being used in more Media), but I think though Canon has bit more sthrength in digital as you said, Nikon seems to be more recoginized intenationally. Why I talk about Tamron & Sigma is , as I studied on web, Tamron 90 macro is accepted by many macro user since its unique soft image. Whereas Sigma 50 macro is famous in excellent sharpness of image. Only weak point is speed of Auto focus and model is old which has no VR/IS(Vibration reduction/Image stabilizer) system in this lens.(I heard Canon is fastest in AF speed in digital field) Regarding weakness in VR/IS system of these lens, I can use pentax or olympus camera which has VR/IS in its body. Especially latest model of Pentax camera has VR whch is equivalent to Nikon/Canon's lens. But i saw on japanese website, some are saying that speed & accuracy of AF as well as VR/IS is not required when one use macro lens. They He says because AF system of any camera cannot make exact forcus as per what one wants and so final adjustment has to be done by manual always. Do you(anyone) feel so while you taking photograph of flowers & trees? Since its expensive shopping for me, I d like to hear advice from user who use for same purpose i.e. taking picture of plant in same climate & atmosphere. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
