Apologies to all. This blunder will not repeat. Have I any way to delete this post ? OR any moderator / administrator wipe this post.
I do not mind reconstructing the post. Again, I stand corrected. Regards. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > in my haste, I forgot to put location. > I found these trees at Bassein fort (near Mumbai). > > Regards. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ... my own reasoning to rach out for *S. mahagoni*: >> - flowers look relatively inconspicuous. >> - the inflorescence seems to be thus lax >> - the fresh leaves look bright green ... stupid reason - I have not seen >> how fresh leaves of *S. macrophylla* look like >> - the bole is relatively shorter - I have read somewhere that *S. >> macrophylla* tends have a cleaner bole >> - shorter bole, rounder canopy ... I do not know whether this makes sense. >> >> Regards. >> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hello friends, >>> >>> I am almost sure that this tree is *Swietenia mahagoni*. >>> Yet, please validate ... not sure how I can rule out *S. macrophylla*. >>> >>> Attached 3 photos, just in case you would like some more views: >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=int&w=91314...@n00&q=Swieteniamahagoni&m=tags >>> >>> Regards. >>> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
