Yes, they do not match, that was the whole point. The foliage I sent was of Sterculia urens. It had been suggested that your tree was S. urens, and it is not. Your tree is, without a doubt, Sterculia villosa.
Best Wishes, Barry Stock Hollywood, Florida, USA On May 7, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Dilip Pandit wrote: > Dear mr. Stock, > > Much as I appreciate your effort to identify the tree, in my humble > opinion the leaves of the tree whose photo you attached with the > mail does not match with the one I posted although there are > similarities. I really do not know whether to id the plant as > Sterculia villosa or wait for more comments of the experts. > > Am attaching the picture once more for the benefit of all. > > Thanks > > Dilip Pandit > > CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [indiantreepix:11662] Re: Id this tree please Arunachal > Pradesh > Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:53:00 -0400 > > I have Sterculia urens growing, flowering and fruiting here, and the > foliage is not lobed like the one photographed. I believe it is S. > villosa, as the linked illustration matches with the bifurcate apex > of the lobed foliage, a singular characteristic. > > Sterculia urens foliage: > > <Sterculia urens foliage 1.jpg> > > Barry Stock > Hollywood, Florida, USA > > > On May 5, 2009, at 9:19 AM, ajinkya gadave wrote: > > may be a Sterculia urens > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Barry ji, > May be as Sterculia villosa per link: > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sterculia_villosa_Bra10.png > > (Illustration),http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200013871 > > (desc. from > FOC),http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=53977&flora_id=5 > (illustration). > > 2009/5/5 Barry Stock <[email protected]> > > Sterculia villosa, then? > > -bs > > > On May 4, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Dilip Pandit wrote: > > I saw the images of the suggested specie on internet. The images of > leaves do not match with the ones I posted. > > Thanks anyway. > > Dilip Pandit > > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [indiantreepix:11590] Re: Id this tree please Arunachal > Pradesh > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:21:42 -0400 > > Probably Cochlospermum religiosum > > -bs > > > On May 4, 2009, at 7:26 AM, ajinkya gadave wrote: > > i think this is Cholosperma religiosa not sure > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dilip Pandit <[email protected] > > wrote: > near Itanagar. > > Thanks in advance > > Dilip Pandit > > MSN Quiz Test your skill and wits on this revered battleground of > knowledge IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got better. > > > > > > > > MSN Quiz Test your skill and wits on this revered battleground of > knowledge IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got better. > > > > > > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > "We often ignore the beauty around us" > Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & > Fauna:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1 > For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/ join Google e- > group (Indiantreepix)http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en > > > > > Get easy photo sharing with Windows LiveT Photos. Drag n' drop --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
