Both seem to be identical. Can it be Cyperus eragrostis?
On Jul 26, 11:31 am, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Prashant, I too have a photo, a single shot only ... it looks very
> similar to what you have posted ... other than *C. niveus*, another
> candidate could be *C. lupulinus*.
> Regards.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Prashant awale <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Ganesh. Could this be *Cyperus niveus*??
>
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM, ganesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Dear Mr. Prshanth,
>
> >> It is not Eriocaulaceae. It is from Cyperaceae. May be nearing the genus
> >> Cyperus.
>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> *From:* Prashant awale <[email protected]>
> >> *To:* indiantreepix <[email protected]>
> >> *Sent:* Sunday, July 26, 2009 9:27 AM
> >> *Subject:* [indiantreepix:14921] Eriocaulon ??
>
> >> Dear friends,
>
> >> Photographed at CBD hills yesterday. Is it Eriocaulon tuberiferum??
>
> >> best wishes
> >> Prashant..
>
>
>
> 817543313_8491dfd037_b.jpg
> 148KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
