Yea, I do agree dear Pankaj, B & H system is widely followed in herbaria But as far as am concern system of classification must give some information in terms of their ecological distribution. Because am basically work in terms of the climatic drivers of the ecosystem, deciphering based on plant markers. So, it is up to you to decide which classification is suited for your research. As far as pure taxonomic classification, yes you can chose your own and just mention it in your article, just I have followed particular classification.
And that's why I have used most dominant one is B & H's system of classification. It means several other classifications also used to classify plants but their frequency of usage is limited. Regards, Stephen... On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Rashida > > It is not that Indians consider Bentham and Hooker's classification > only, its up to you if you wish to follow which classification. Some > times I even go against APG II as some points, one of which is, APG II > considers Acslepiadaceae as a part of Apocynaceae and and not as a > distinct family, tell me will you agree with it or not. > Incase you are working on any research article, you just need to say > which classification you have followed, and that may not be B & H. > Bentham and Hooker's classification is followed throughout the world > for maintaining the herbaria because it is supposed to be very easy to > understand. > Regards > Pankaj > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Stephen A<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Regarding classification doubt, as of India and Indians concern most > > dominant one is Bentham and Hooker's classification followed by many > other > > classifications based on the phylogeny, life form, etc... > > Yes, indeed several researchers adopt many other classifications based on > > monographic works of individual families or genera, etc... > > But ecologists prefer life form or functional classification of plants. > > > > The recent taxonomic classification is APG II system of classification. > > > > You can get a clear overview of system of plant classification available > so > > far from the following wikipedia link, > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_systems_of_plant_taxonomy > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Stephen... > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, rashida atthar < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Thank you very much Dr. Stephen for the very pertinent explanations and > >> links. > >> > >> May I ask one more question which I have had for a while now, it > pertains > >> to the classification systems adopted. I wish to know which is the > >> dominant system of classification, the one based on plant > characteristics or > >> the one based on plant relations which I believe leads to > re-classification > >> of some of the plants into a different family altoghether. Is there any > >> other system adopted by researchers? Thank you. > >> > >> regards, > >> Rashida. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:00:41 +0530 > >> Subject: [indiantreepix:17855] Re: Lygodium flexcuosum-climbing fern > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > >> > >> Yea I do agree it is called Basionym. > >> The exact definition mentioned in the ICBN is follows, > >> "A previously published legitimate name-bringing or epithet-bringing > >> synonym from which a new name is formed for a taxon of different rank or > >> position" > >> The same can be located from the following link, > >> http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/no%20frames/0120AppendixVII.htm > >> > >> The latest Vienna code link given by you is broken > >> The same can be located from the following link. > >> http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Stephen... > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> the latest Vienna Code of ICBN can be accessed at the following link > >> > >> http://www.ibot.sav.sk/karolx/kod/0000Viennatitle.htm > >> > >> Just to add to the information by Dr. Stephen, the bracketed author is > >> often referred to as the author of the basionym. > >> > >> Regards > >> Pankaj > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Think about the Environment before printing this e-mail! ü > >> +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ > >> Think B4U Print > >> 1 ream of paper = 6% of a tree and 5.4kg CO2 in the atmosphere > >> 3 sheets of A4 paper = 1 litre of water > >> +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ > >> "Lets Protect What We Enjoy" > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> Date India’s Teen Diva. Find out if you hit it off with her or are her > >> fiery opposite. Drag n’ drop > > > > > > -- > > Think about the Environment before printing this e-mail! ü > > +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ > > Think B4U Print > > 1 ream of paper = 6% of a tree and 5.4kg CO2 in the atmosphere > > 3 sheets of A4 paper = 1 litre of water > > +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ > > "Lets Protect What We Enjoy" > > > -- Think about the Environment before printing this e-mail! ü +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ Think B4U Print 1 ream of paper = 6% of a tree and 5.4kg CO2 in the atmosphere 3 sheets of A4 paper = 1 litre of water +----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------+ "Lets Protect What We Enjoy" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
