Sir,

More info of *Oxalis stricta* can be found in -

   - http://gobotany.newenglandwild.org/species/oxalis/stricta/
   - http://www.wildflower.org/plants/result.php?id_plant=OXST
   - http://www.ocmga.org/uploads/WOTM_Feb12.pdf
   - http://www.wildflower.org/gallery/species.php?id_plant=OXST

Thank you,
Regards,
surajit



On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:46 PM, J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Forwarding again for any assistance in the matter please.
>
> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>
>  If one belives these websites and some indications on Flora of China
> websites, majority of my (and may be others also) phototographs presumed to
> be O. corniculata may actually be O. stricta:
> http://oregonstate.edu/dept/nursery-weeds/weedspeciespage/
> OXALIS/oxalis_species.html
> http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/plantbiology/ncsc/containerWeeds/Oxalis_
> corniculata_stricta.htm
> The same feeling I get when I make search of Google images for these two
> species.
> May be Santosh ji will help us to solve this confusion.
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>    Here is the pdf of second paper on caulescent species of Oxalis by the
> same author Nesom, published in 2009 in J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 3(2): 727
> – 738. 2009. It should help further:
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>
>  Thank you very much for focusing our view towards this major issue and
> providing us differences between two allied species of *Oxalis*.
> Fortunately, the specimen of *Oxalis* L. which I have posted on 4thMarch,
> (https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!msg/
> indiantreepix/xOQh8-8DEZg/Yv9orRkLJ5sJ) has been worked out by my PG
> students of Scottish Church College in their practical lab and after
> matching with keys from local flora we confirmed its identity as “*Oxalis
> corniculata*L.” Moreover, much pubescent nature of the margin of leaflets
> (in comparison to *O. stricta* L.) can be viewed after zooming the
> picture. The plant was creeping, NOT erect to decumbent and without any
> stolon I remembered.
>
>  Please share the distributional range of *O. stricta* L.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sukla
>
>
> I think the attached photographs (recorded this morning, beside our
> kitchen drainage) are of *Oxalis corniculata* L., because, as per FoC -
>
>    1. petioles are not pubescent in *O. stricta* L. -
>    
> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242416902<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242416902>
>    2. peduncles are not 2x or more longer than petioles -
>    
> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242416902<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242416902>
>
> But, fruiting pedicel seems to be erect in my photographs.
> Thank you.
> Regards,
> surajit
>
>
> At the begining of this week I had thought that perhaps we will be able to
> hunt out O. stricta. In fact at one stage I thought I had found one, but
> then I had to give up, because I was not satisfied. That is why I had
> withheld my upload of Oxalis corniculata, it was my last post today in
> frustration.
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>
>
> I have memorized keys of both the species. I searched last two days if i
> could find *O. stricta*, but there wasn't any.
> FoC says it is found in forests and ravines at 400-1500 m.
> Regards,
> surajit
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>
> Date: 4 March 2013 14:31
> Subject: [efloraofindia:147944] Balsaminaceae, Geraniaceae and Oxalidaceae
> Week: Oxalidaceae-Looking for Oxalis stricta..kindly shuffle through your
> collections of O. corniculata
> To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
>
>
> Dear members
> I request you to go through your collections of Oxalis corniculata for
> possible specimens of Oxalis stricta. The two species are very closed and
> can be easily confused, but following features should help:
>
> Oxalis corniculata: Plants mostly creeping, stolons absent; flowers in
> umbellate cymes or solitary; fruiting pedicels deflexed to horizontal
>
> Oxalis stricta: Plants erect to decumbent; stolon present; flowers in a
> cymose inflorescence; fruiting pedicels erect.
>
> Kindly don't get confused by the photograph on Flowers of India which on
> the basis of larger flowers in an umbel, absence of any stem and leaves in
> the photograph apparently belongs to O. pes-caprae and not O. stricta
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
> alphabetically & place-wise):
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world):
> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2065 members &
> 1,47,500 messages on 28/2/13) or Efloraofindia website:
> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
> of more than 8000 species).
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to