I thought the spur is short in this picture..(In relation to flower/petal) I am in the learning phase. Long and short are relative terms that's why experts who have seen more specimens are needed. Even different floras have some differences in the descriptions. I understood that the picture attached is A. maculosa? I appreciate and like your frank and clear discussion. Satish Phadke
2009/10/6 Dr. Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> > > > I couldnt make out if u wish to say that this pic is Aerides > multiflora or maculosa ENDS WITH AN "A". > This pic according to me belongs to Aerides maculosa only, the spur is > too long and offcourse, the lip is saddle shaped. Spur in multiflora > is too short, minute infact, but prominent. > Mr. J. M. Garg sent me one dvd, in which all collections of pics were > there. In one folder called, AERIDES MACULOSUM, containing four pics. > What I wrote was that the third pic which was labelled as Aerides > maculosum01 was infact not maculosum but Aerides multiflora. Rest of > the three pics in that folder was Aerides maculosa only!! > My point was misunderstood!! > Hope now it is understood properly. > Regards > Pankaj > > > > -- http:// satishphadke.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
