I think in my 2nd upload at, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/yF8IhDueTFc, perhaps there were two plants, one male and the other female growing side by side. Only this line of thinking can explain the presence/absence of bracts on flowers.
Thank you, Regards, surajit On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:55 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > You may ask, "Why again!" > Because - > > 1. to remove confusion, against *M. mixta* > Roxb<http://images.kew.org/momordica_mixta_roxb/print/654453.html>. > (*M. cochinchinensis* > Spreng<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-50043687> > ) > 2. bracts on female flowers absent in this plant found in another > homeyard ( bract was present in female - > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/yF8IhDueTFc and > in male - > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/tmmOgn82pgg > ) > 3. no petiolar gland > 4. leaves without lobes in all cases i've come across > > Perhaps > FoC<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200022701>is > correct when it says, "Female flower solitary; pedicels filiform, 5-10 > cm; *usually with a minute bract* at base..." > > Thank you > Regards > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
