So the confusion still remains..... Dr Satish Phadke
On 6 November 2013 13:51, avinash adsul <[email protected]> wrote: > Respected Sirs, > Please refer the attached paper, It can be V. indica > earlier it was V. trilobata var pusila > > > On Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:38:19 AM UTC+5:30, Dr Phadke wrote: > >> Forwarding again in view of Papilionaceae week. >> Attaching few new photos. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Satish Phadke <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:44 AM >> Subject: PlANT FOR ID 146 SMP OCT 09 >> To: indiantreepix Indian <[email protected]> >> >> >> A climber Pune 4th Oct 09. Growing wild for ID >> Lobed leaves. Flower indicate to be from Fabaceae >> Satish Phadke >> >> -- >> >> http:// satishphadke.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr Satish Phadke >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
