I was confused. It is indeed Flueggea virosa Tapas
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Yes. > > Dr Satish Phadke > > > On 2 December 2013 20:42, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No. The inflorescence is very different. >> Tapas >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Prashant Awale <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Friends, >>> >>> I had seen this Shrub here in Mumbai in June. Could this be *Flueggea >>> leucopyrus*?? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Prashant >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
