Yes, it looks like B. acuminata.. Refer Rheedea20_81-130..
Regards Prashant On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Gurumurthi Hegde <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes, Kottaimuthu ji has rightly said. >> > *Barleria acuminata *Wight ex Nees > > Sorry for neglecting the few characters. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
