Thanks for your comments Radha Ji. I guess the leaves are strigosely hairy below in the posted plant (as seen in P 1200395.JPG). But, if we follow the key provided in Fl. Pakistan, cilia should be much shorter than the tube. Still I'll go with your identification as the strigose character seems more reliable to me. Further, as per the updated nomenclature, the plant should be treated as a distinct species i.e Persicaria stagnina (Buch.-Ham. ex Miz.) Qaiser. But please check your plant/specimen one more time for the above mentioned characters.
Regards, Ritesh. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
