I think it represents Memecylon umbellatum Burm.f. This is neither M. royenii nor M. heyneanum
On 8 March 2014 18:15, Ajit Ampalakkad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This was shot in lalbagh botanical garden, bangalore on 8th march 2014. > The name plate on the tree says its a Memecylon heynearum which i feel is > an error. One gentleman confirmed this not to be a heynearum and that this > is a Memecylon royenii. > > I need more experts to comment on this an confirm the ID whether its a > Memecylon royenii? Kindly help me with this regard. > > Rgds > Ajit > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- SANTHOSH ------------------------------------------ Dr. E.S. Santhosh Kumar MSc, PhD, FIAT, FLS (on leave ) Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, Palode Thiruvananthapuram-695562 Kerala India www.drsanthosh.wetpaint.com Presently working for the British Aerospace, Riyadh, KSA NB: Please consider your environmental responsibility! Ask yourself before printing this email !!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
