Neil ji
You have solved my confusion. We have a species of Peristrophe growing in
Delhi, very tall with delicate spreading inflorescence, and identified as P.
bicalyculata, now correctly known as P. paniculata. The plant uploaded by
Satish ji was perhaps uploaded earlier also and identified as P. paniculata.
I was confused when I found a similar plant in Manali, which I know is much
different from our Delhi Plant, being shorter, stouter and with condensed
inflorescence and twice larger flowers, although frankly flowers look
similar to Peristrophe in appearance. From Collet's Flora and Bubu's flora
 I identify this Manali plant as Dicliptera bupleuroides, and it appears
reasonable. I will upload them shortly. Thanks for the lead.

     Here is some more food for discussion. To me it appears that the
photograph of Peristrophe bicalyculata on FlowersOfIndia website really
belongs to Dicliptera bupleuroides. The flowers are in clusters and not in
loose panicles (characteristic of P. paniculata) and flowers much larger.
Another plant: This from Dinesh Valke's photostream to me appears to be
genuine plant of Peristrophe paniculata

http://images.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2197/1964869546_a2b082110a.jpg&imgrefurl=http://flickr.com/photos/91314...@n00/1964869546&usg=__cnxiudH8DqTCgrb5wyUj8GElm5M=&h=375&w=500&sz=127&hl=en&start=7&sig2=z94cp9kvmQqlaigiuAHoIA&tbnid=bt5XFaOFGBWDSM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dperistrophe%2Bpaniculata%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG&ei=cswHS9vcPJDc7APyv9GJDw





-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Satish,
>   This looks like Dicliptera foetida.
>                   Regards,
>                     Neil.
>
> --- On *Fri, 11/20/09, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Satish Phadke <[email protected]>
> Subject: [indiantreepix:23557] PLANT FOR ID 176 SMP NOV 2009
> To: "indiantreepix Indian" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 7:26 PM
>
>
> I think this was discussed earlier. Can't get to it......Fabaceae shrub.
> Mahabaleshwar Nov 2009
> Dr Satish Phadke
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "indiantreepix" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "indiantreepix" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=.
>

x

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=.


Reply via email to