Rawat Ji, Thanks for validation and the additional information. Regards, Aarti
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:14 AM, D.S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes in my opinion it is C.paniculatus. However, the plant seems to have > variability and in inner hills in Himalaya it makes smaller inflorescences > while here in outer hills and also in Pantnagar it may produce one feet > long inflorescences. > DSRawat Pantnagar > > > On Friday, June 6, 2014 10:38:00 AM UTC+5:30, Aarti S. Khale wrote: >> >> Climber seen growing wild. >> Is this Celastrus paniculatus which was recently posted by me from Nasik? >> Kindly validate. >> Aarti >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
