In continuation of my earlier mail of today:

Bharhut near Satna in M. P. was a second-first century BC Buddhist Stupa. It 
was discovered by the British archaeologist Alexander Cunningham and its 
sculptures were transported to the Indian Museum in Calcutta. Bharhut's 
photographs can be seen in the archives of the American Institute of Indian 
Studies, Gurgaon or on their website 
http://dsal.uchicago.edu/images/aiis/database.html. On Google you can insert 
American Institute of Indian Studies Photo Archives. A search for Bharhut will 
open more than six hundred photographs. If you feed 68516, 68517 or 68520 in 
the Numbers box you will see Chulakoka Devata standing under an Ashoka tree, 
and 68578/68579 will take you to Chanda Yakshi under a Mesua ferrea tree. These 
sculptures are similar to the photo posted by me, each figure under a different 
tree.
"Chulakoka" means "little goddess with the voice of the Chakravaka bird".
K. MankodiFrom: Satish Phadke <[email protected]>Sent: Fri, 27 Jun 
2014 11:19:58 To: Kirit Mankodi <[email protected]>Cc: radha veach 
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, Anna Pinto 
<[email protected]>Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:192137] Photo of 
a Bharhut Tree
We are closely following and enjoying the thread. Please continue posting and 
sharing. Members will come forward with their thoughts.

Dr Satish Phadke
On 27 June 2014 09:45, Kirit Mankodi <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Madam,

Thank you very much for the photo. The next time I visit that area, near Satna, 
I will enquire about Couroupita and any other trees that match the foliage and 
flowers in the Bharhut sculpture.

In some time I will post a photo of another interesting tree/herb from ancient 
India.

Best regards.


K. MankodiFrom: radha veach <[email protected]>Sent: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 
09:17:27 To: Kirit Mankodi <[email protected]>Cc: 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Anna 
Pinto <[email protected]> 

Subject: Re: Photo of a Bharhut TreeDear Sir,I am sending you the link to an 
image of Couroupita leaves for your 
reference.http://pics.davesgarden.com/pics/2006/09/13/jnana/424353.jpglook 
forward to your feedback.regardsRadhaOn 26/06/2014, Kirit Mankodi 
<[email protected]> wrote:> Dear Madam,>> Thank you for 
your mail. I have just forwarded to you my earlier mail tsent> o Dr. 
Vijayasankar. I had my doubt about the leaves, of which there is a> 
profusion, while Couroupita  photographs I saw do not have any 
leaves.> But Kadamba should be eliminated, because the Kadamba flower does 
not look> like this sculpture. Two thousand years ago flowering trees were 
present> before the eyes of the sculptors and they would not have taken the 
liberty> of combining two species, I think. Among the Bharhut sculptures 
five or six> species of trees are represented under which female figures 
stand, and all> are faithful renderings, both foliage and flowers.> So, 
please keep thinking; I will be eager for your feedback.>>> Best 
regards.>>> K. Mankodi>>> From: radha veach 
[email protected] Sent: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:44:59 To:> 
[email protected]: [email protected]: Re: 
Photo> of a Bharhut Tree> Dear Sir,this is very interesting.I can see why 
Couroupita has been> suggested but I have some doubts because the leaves in 
the sculpture do not> resemble leaves of that tree at all.They actually look 
more like Peepal> leaves, (Ficus religiosa). At a stretch you could say they 
were kadamba> leaves (Neolamarckia cadamba) and the circular thing being 
kadamba flowers> with many petals.Perhaps the sculptor has taken an artistic 
licence and> combined features of more than one species which he has 
seen.regardsRadhaOn> Saturday, June 21, 2014 5:31:17 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg 
wrote:>>> Forwardingfor Id assistance please.> ---------- Forwarded 
message ----------From: Kirit Mankodi> 
<[email protected]>Date: 21 June 2014 15:23Subject: Photo of 
a> Bharhut TreeTo: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Cc: 
Anna Pinto> <[email protected]>> Dear Sir,>> I 
am writing to you after viewing your botanical photographs in 
Wikipedia.>> Can you identifythis flowering tree from Bharhut in central 
India, please? I> will be much obliged.>> Thank you.>> K. 
Mankodi>>>>> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & 
FREE mobile app with Company> email.> Know More >> 'Creating 
awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'The whole world uses my> Image 
Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images> of 
Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically &> 
place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license> 
attached with each image.> For identification, learning, discussion 
& documentation of Indian> Flora, please visit/ join our 
Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the> world- around 2350 members 
& 1,90,000 messages on 31/5/14) or> Efloraofindia website (with a 
species database of more than 9500 species> & 1,90,000 images).> 
Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds 
of> India'.>>>>>>>>>>> 




Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company 
email.  
Know More >
-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
from it, send an email to [email protected] post to 
this group, send email to [email protected] this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to