*P. reticulatus* is not matching sir. The plant I have found lacks the 5 calyx lobes and pubescent branches seen in* P. reticulatus*.. *P. gardnerianus* perhaps?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > It seems Phyllanthus reticulatus > > On Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:25:43 PM UTC+5:30, Anurag Sharma wrote: >> >> Chikamagalur-Kemmangudi Road >> 13th September 2014 >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
