Dear Surajit ji
Problem with the single thread would be when it would be bulky and Google
does not allow any more attachments.
I think in that case we can start new thread with -2, -3 etc.
But then for the purpose of convenient search I think each term has
separate thread. A member may start the thread and others add their images
or additional information through replies. That way a member can easily
explore a term.
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:12 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Didi,
> My question was - should we upload the pictures in one single thread
> defining the 'particular term' so that the very single thread serves as a
> ready-reckoner with all its variations within the term? If wrong pictures
> are uploaded in the same thread we would learn instantly where the pictures
> went wrong.
> If the posts are made in separate threads that will be inconvenient for a
> dictionary for future use as well as for new members. It won't serve quick
> glance purpose.
> Thank you
> Regards
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Ushadi Micromini <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> yes that too... we should definitely have pictures
>> picture we took ourselves and got identified
>> or drew as in class room
>> or from the net
>>
>> or from some book with their permission or full quotation/reference give.
>>
>> that would be lovely, please see above, what I wrote to Satish
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:03 PM, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> A pictorial botanary i think, novel and very useful idea. Do we upload
>>> pictures/images in the same/master thread or separately as we do during
>>> regular fortnight?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good idea Ushadi and Satish ji.
>>>> Let us start them again.
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>> Retired Associate Professor
>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Ushadi Micromini <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good idea
>>>>> I am in the same boat as you Satish...and a bit further behind in
>>>>> terms of botanical definitions terms than you,
>>>>>
>>>>> I welcome the idea..
>>>>>
>>>>> I will even ask questions about some new term i donot know..
>>>>> so Gurcharanji, Nidhan, Vijaya, Dr Rawat et al will have a lot of
>>>>> willing students and terms to define and illustrate.
>>>>>
>>>>> It will be our own open university.
>>>>>
>>>>> WHat a great idea.
>>>>> Usha di
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Samir Mehta <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> '*"term of the week*" (Was started earlier by Garg ji but somehow
>>>>>> not supported by others with the same zeal)'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great idea, why not restart it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Samir Mehta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:40:22 PM UTC+5:30, Satish Phadke
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are perfect with your teaching. Don't change anything. These
>>>>>>> terms are stimulus for us to learn. In fact I have an idea of starting
>>>>>>> something like.......
>>>>>>> *"term of the week*" (Was started earlier by Garg ji but somehow
>>>>>>> not supported by others with the same zeal) Here some term will be
>>>>>>> coined
>>>>>>> by some expert for a week and evryone will try to upload pictures
>>>>>>> supporting it.We can find variation it it also.Future ideas must evolve
>>>>>>> tomake the group interesting Isn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Satish ji
>>>>>>>> I used the term uncinate initially but when I described the spines
>>>>>>>> at the end I was reminded of persons like you and used hooked, which
>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>> the same. I think I will have to learn to be less technical in future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>> Retired Associate Professor
>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I liked the way Sir ji gives the description So neat.I have to
>>>>>>>>> recheck all my Triumfettas.
>>>>>>>>> Some botanical terms are difficult to digest though(Uncinate
>>>>>>>>> spines: I will search it; no issues. Are they typically seen here in
>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>> pictures?)...Still most of the description is so clear. The
>>>>>>>>> characters are
>>>>>>>>> illustrated in the pictures too.
>>>>>>>>> Usha di. The cyme is 3 flowered I suppose; that is it consists of
>>>>>>>>> 3 flowers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ushadi micromini <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> very thoughtful...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> what is 3 flowered?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Usha di
>>>>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 3:10 pm, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > *Triumfetta annua* Linn., Mant. 1:73. 1767.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > The species is distinct from others in its orange flowers and
>>>>>>>>>> glabrous
>>>>>>>>>> > uncinate spines on the fruit. Annual herb up to 1 m tall, stem
>>>>>>>>>> purplish on
>>>>>>>>>> > one side with line of hairs; leaves ovate to ovate-lanceolate,
>>>>>>>>>> 3-5-veined
>>>>>>>>>> > from base, stipules linear, hirsute; cymes leaf-opposed,
>>>>>>>>>> usually 3-flowered;
>>>>>>>>>> > flowers orange, 8 mm across, petals slightly smaller than
>>>>>>>>>> sepals; stamens
>>>>>>>>>> > 10; capsule globose 9-11 mm in diam including spines which are
>>>>>>>>>> 4-5 mm long
>>>>>>>>>> > glabrous and with hooked tips.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Photographed from near Kalsi along Mussoorie Chakrata road on
>>>>>>>>>> September 16,
>>>>>>>>>> > 2011
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>>> > Retired Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>>> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>>> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>>> > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.
>>>>>>>>>> in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Triumfetta-annua-Between Dakpathar and Kalsi-2.jpg
>>>>>>>>>> > 176KViewDownload
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Triumfetta-annua-Mussoorie-Chakrata Road near Kalsi-3.jpg
>>>>>>>>>> > 143KViewDownload
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Triumfetta-annua-near Dakpathar towards Kalsi-1.jpg
>>>>>>>>>> > 100KViewDownload
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Usha di
>>>>> ===========
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Usha di
>> ===========
>>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
