Yes N. nauchalii, anther appendages are clearly seen in 6th photograph (second from left in second row) of first set.
Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:15 AM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Yet another set recorded at another place. > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:12 AM, surajit koley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Since this set, recorded elsewhere some other time, feature flowers >> having more than 12 petals it should be *N. cyanea* Roxb. as per >> http://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2008/biol0708wl_ch3.pdf, but >> following TPL & GRIN I attach in this very thread. >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 7:51 AM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It looks very close to *N. cyanea* Roxb., but differs in petal numbers >>> and sepal character. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
