Gurcharan Ji,
I agree with you.
When I was searching the id for my tree, I found single fruit & larger in
size in Umbellularia californica, which matched with my pictures.
This is how I had come to the id as being closest to my pictures.
Regards,
Aarti

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Vijayasankar ji
> I request you to have a relook at the second image. I have cropped fruits
> portion from original so that you can have a look again. I feel the fruits
> are too small and too many for Umbellularia californica.
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Aarti ji for the wishes. I wish you all a wonderful Diwali, too.
>>
>> Badri ji, thanks. As I have mentioned earlier, Umbellularia californica
>> is native to California and its adjoining and is not present or grown in
>> India. However, its essential oil can be used in controlling mosquito when
>> it is proved to be safe to use.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Vijayasankar
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Vijayasankar Raman, Ph.D.
>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>> University of Mississippi
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Vijayasankar Ji,
>>> Really appreciate your kind words for me.
>>> I just enjoy observing nature wherever I go.
>>> Time was too short with a family wedding, which was the main purpose of
>>> our visit.
>>> All California plants & trees are under my scanner and I could identify
>>> quite a few of them.
>>> Will be posting them as time permits.
>>> Wishing you and your family a Happy Diwali!
>>> Regards,
>>> Aarti
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gurcharan ji, I think the 2nd picture is U. californica. Other two
>>>> pictures are correctly identified. As you might know, U. californica is
>>>> native to California, Oregon etc. whereas, L. nobilis is a Mediterranean
>>>> species and occurs only under cultivation in the USA.
>>>>
>>>> Aarti ji, I really appreciate your identification of this (and several
>>>> other) species and also your keen observations. These plants can confuse
>>>> even trained experts. Great work!
>>>> In our paper <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf4052682>, we have
>>>> compared both the species by their chemistry and leaf anatomy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Vijayasankar
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Vijayasankar Raman, Ph.D.
>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vijayasankar Ji, Gurcharan Ji,
>>>>> Thanks a lot for the id and additional information.
>>>>> Since returning, I have been trying to find ids on Google search.
>>>>> Thats how I had found the id to be *Umbellularia californica, C*alifornian
>>>>> Bay Laurel of Lauraceae.
>>>>> My observation was that the fruits were slightly bigger than those of
>>>>> Laurus nobilis.
>>>>> Thanks for the correction Vijayasankar Ji.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Vijayasankar ji for alert. I now remember these fruits when we
>>>>>> visited Shasta Caverns in 2008. I think I have both. I am uploading both
>>>>>> for your validation. I have checked Japson Flora. Both are recorded from
>>>>>> California
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?query_src=ucjeps&enlarge=0000+0000+0901+0086
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?query_src=ucjeps&enlarge=0000+0000+0905+1342
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aarti ji and Gurcharan ji, you both are correct in a way or other!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is *Umbellularia californica *(californian bay laurel) often
>>>>>>> mistaken for and/or adulterated to the Mediterranean or Sweet bay 
>>>>>>> laurel,
>>>>>>> Laurus nobilis. This plant (U. californica) is used in the same was as 
>>>>>>> L.
>>>>>>> nobilis but it causes severe headache in some people who are allergic to
>>>>>>> it. Umbellulone is the compound responsible for this allergic action
>>>>>>> present in the leaves of U. californica.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please check this article for more details
>>>>>>> http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf4052682
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vijayasankar
>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Aarti S. Khale <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gurcharan Ji,
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the id.
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Gurcharan Singh <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Laurus nobilis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Laurus$20nobilis/indiantreepix/I_89hvx-f70/ol-NcCHkxzwJ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Aarti S. Khale <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seen in the premises of a school in Fremont on 28th Sept,14.
>>>>>>>>>> Is it Umbellularia californica of Lauraceae?
>>>>>>>>>> Medium tree.
>>>>>>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to