S. pueckleri is known to be available from some growers in california and inaustrallia, and owned by some, but i cant be 100% sure of the id here in this case.
But i wont argue either ... not enough data . Lets see what Gurcharan ji thinks usha di On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Divya Umesh <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it looks more like Schefflera pueckleri > > Divya Umesh > > > On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 9:36:57 PM UTC+8, Aarti S. Khale wrote: >> >> Ornamental tree seen in the premises of a multi story complex in Los >> Angeles on 3rd Oct,14. >> Seem to be Schefflera Species. >> Aarti >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Usha di =========== -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
