Dear All:  just because something seems to be a climber and growing tall
does not negate  the its identity , to my mind

I have a green chilli plant right now in my kitchen that's almost dying but
all thru the year it grew as a straggly almost three foot  long "vining"
plant
its just that the seed (from the same one red chilli) got stuck at an edge
in a small pot and that seedling just struggled and grew taller by the
minute... flowered once , never set fruit... it spent all its nutrition and
energy into growing tall;     while rest of the seeds'  seedlings grew to
normal in bigger pots on the same window sill..same light same water same
food.. just a different foothold...

Take home message to me has been ...

i*f all else fits, it must get the label of its id..*.

Same as in cancer tumors that grow  into mass and stay that way while in
somebody else may spread and spread..we have a " seed and soil"  theory for
cancer growth ... mother nature being what it is  must play the same design
in growth in all biological systems , up to a point...

is my two cents worth.

thanks...

usha di

*Post script: *
In Shantiniketan on the grounds of Gurudev's homestead and other
huts/homes  there is a vining tree, I want to say mango but it may be
something else, I have forgotten' but its a normally a nice large tree,
erect stout.. ... but there in that garden its "vining" , one of the
brothers or nephews noticed it early on and gave such support as to let it
vine.... after almost nearly 100 years its still in that form..

its still present and growing and the guides point it out proudly...

so it happens, has  happened...

taught me to keep an open mind not only in human cancers, but in botany
also ...

this is regarding  a polygonum... january 2015
[efloraofindia:210913] Climber from Uttarakhand 08: ID Requested

nice case




On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Dinesh Singh Rawat <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you Sir for your attention.
>>
>
> By description in flora,..*P. chinesis* is a *herb, up to 1 m tall*, but
> the present study is a *climber ca. 4 m long*. However, inflorescence and
> fruiting pattern matching with *P. chinensis*.I also check it for *P.
> convolvulus *(Climber), but differing in  spike like inflorescence.
>
> Regards
> Dinesh Singh Rawat
> HNBGU, Srinagar, Uttarakhand
>
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Usha di
===========

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to