Thank you Ushadi and Dr Rawat for your advice. I will wait for these to flower and post once again for ID confirmation.
Regards, Ashwini On 04-Mar-2015, at 10:46 am, D.S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote: > Usha Di is right in saying that flowering is the exact stage to determine > exact ID. > The first one to me is Sedum rosulatum and second one (with hairy leaves) is > an Androsace species. But the same thing I will reiterate here- flowering is > the exact stage to determine exact ID. > And flowering is not too distant, will be visible withing 45-60 days (late > April-May). > Most often taxonomists are accustomed to recognize plants in flowering only. > There are taxonomists which recognize plants only when it is in the form of > herbarium specimens. Fortunately, we have taxonomists of all types in the > group. I am sure these plants will be identified once in flowering. > DSRawat Pantnagar > > Dr D.S.Rawat > Department of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & > Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Ushadi Micromini <[email protected]> > wrote: > Ashwini > these are naturally growing i take.. > > first two are a sedum, one of the himalalyan stonecrop.. species name eludes > me right now.. > may be sedum sedoides , but I may be off base... its supposed to have some > hairy leaves ... but best diagnosis is after it flowers... > > > and last three are Sempervium.. of the hens and chicks group of succulents.. > and these grow in colder mountainous climes > > Some echeverias can be hirsute also but they grow in mexico > > > Just like in sedum's case best diagnosis is from the flowering stalk and its > shape etc and flowers themselves. > > hope it helps > > and my be Gurcharanji and Dr Rawat may have more details > hope to hear from them > usha di > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Ashwini Bhatia <[email protected]> > wrote: > I photographed these on two different locations on different days. Though the > general shape is similar, there is a difference in the surface texture (the > one photographed earlier on a dry day is hairier). I thought these belong to > spurge family but I am most likely wrong. Please advise. > > Mcleodganj, Dharamshala, HP > 1750m > 22 Feb/ 03 March 2015 > > Thanks. > Ashwini > > <IMG_2709_3March15.jpg><IMG_2710_3March15.jpg> > > 22 Feb 15 > > <IMG_2563_22Feb15.jpg><IMG_2564_22Feb15.jpg><IMG_2564c_22Feb15.jpg> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Usha di > =========== -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
