Dr Rawt I knew it as a *Euphorbia panchganiensis*
so i had googled it middle of the nite and was surprised to see name nana what makes people change an obviously indian origin name to a nondescript name like nana this is what i dont understand usha di On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:08 PM, D.S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks to the people conserving it. > The earlier name was *Euphorbia panchganiensis* Blatt. & Mc Cann > synonymysed with it now. > Mentioned in Red Data Book of Indian Plants Vol-3:122-123 as rare. > Earlier known from Maharashtra as *E.panchganiensis* but now known from > Western Himalaya too. > Thanks for showing this rare species Sir! > I never saw it in Uttarakhand during last two and a half decade. > > DSRawat Pantnagar > > > On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 10:14:29 PM UTC+5:30, tchakrab wrote: >> >> Ex situ conservation at Botanical Survey of India, Pune. >> Regards, >> Tapas. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Usha di =========== -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
