A few terminal umbels doesn't pose problem, Anurag Ji, for Gamble's,KEY tells us "usually lateral" in *S. brunonianum*.
But where did you get 0.5 mm style? Another point against *S. intermedium* is the corona lobes in your species may not be called acute, outer ones look like (sub)obtuse and the inner ones acuminate. But, I am not sure. Thank you Regards On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > Surajit sir, > > Now that I am going through the 0101 photo, I can spot various other spots > where there are terminal umbels. It would put the characters as > intermediate between the two species given in this > <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=umMFT6tKtrkC&pg=PA307&lpg=PA307&dq=sarcostemma+intermedium&source=bl&ots=1BLI-_SD9-&sig=GieblcJyn2aQ8XOusDrPppse3HM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wKhHVdvnDsbEmAXa5oDQAw&ved=0CC0Q6AEwBTgU#v=onepage&q=sarcostemma%20intermedium&f=false>. > This is a little perplexing for me. > Agreed that *S. intermedium *may very well not be it. > Also, I feel that .5 mm style could not be called elongated and thus may > not be applicable to this plant according to the description of *Cynanchum > sarcomedium* in the paper! > > I feel we should leave this here as- more points in favour of *S. > viminale *and lesser in favour of the other species (mainly *S. > intermedium*). > In case I should find this plant again elsewhere or another species, I > will make sure to record a lot more details. > > What do you think sir? > > -- > Anurag N. Sharma > BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year > St. Josephs College > Bangalore > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
