Thank you very much Sir, my guess was simply wild (as you noted, some wrote the taxon as small tree). I wish I could see it one more time. If it still survives I would try to get flowers as well, should be around Nov.-Dec.
Regards surajit koley On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you very much Surajit. > Since you have asked about Bridelia stipularis, let me clarify one point > here. B. stipularis is predominantly a markedly pubescent climber ( a few > collectors noted it to be a small tree) with large female calyx and larger > fruits on the average. There was a doubt raised recently on another post > having fruiting materials of B. retusa but with large female calyx. Now, > the present photographs are of dried specimens while your earlier post > contained photos of fresh material. They will obviously differ in > measurements. Whatever measurements we see in literature are based on > dried materials, in case of flowers, soaked in water and therefore these > measurements are bound to be less that what we actually see and measure in > field. > Your photographs do not show any climbing habit and villous parts and so > we can rule out B. stipularis. If you do not mind, I would rather like to > assign the name Bridelia verrucosa Haines which seems to be more probable. > Distribution is as follows: > India: Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh; > Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan. > Regards, > TC. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:53 PM, surajit koley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Sir, >> >> I photographed it in Konnagarh-Nabagram area, a rather rural area >> adjacent to Delhi road, I was on my way to attend a birthday party. It was >> almost evening and photographed using flash. >> >> I have noted that number of nerves doesn't agree, but thought leaves >> could be young in the collected specimen. My guess, *Bridelia stipularis* >> (L.) >> Blume? I'm attaching one higher resolution of leaf photograph. >> >> Thank you very much for taking care. And please call me by my name, I am >> your student here. >> >> Regards >> >> surajit koley >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Surajitji, >>> I have seen your earlier post also through the link given by you. >>> Thanks. Please let me know from where you have taken the photographs. Then >>> I can arrive at a conclusion. The characters of the leaves do not agree >>> with Bridelia retusa. >>> Regards, >>> TC. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:53 AM, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Earlier thread - >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/EJY3ACFUT78/IoeTa9a_UqUJ >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> Regards >>>> surajit koley >>>> a *non-botanist* member of >>>> efloraofIndia google group >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
