As a member of the group I suggested the ID based on the resemblance of the photograph. Certainly not to counter any body. It is up to the experts to accept or reject it. Purpose is to get the correct ID. Nothing wrong in rechecking the characters by taxonomic experts.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:51 PM, D.S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, once Dr Balakrishnan identified, it should be taken as final ID. He > is the expert of Euphorbiaceae and written complete account of the family > for India. I also correct here my earlier ID as per the suggestion by by Dr > Balakrishnan. > DSRawat Pantnagar > > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 8:06:17 AM UTC+5:30, noorafsha abdulla wrote: >> >> Request for identification of plant >> >> Family: Euphorbiaceae >> Habit: Herb >> Location: Thane, Maharashtra >> Date: 15th June 2015 >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/G5KEm6vPTRQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
