Thank you Sir. One earlier thread by Aarti Ji
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/cOU1rcSRo2A/SvI6Ws3xDnEJ>
looks somewhat similar to species. Presently I mark it with *E. heyneana*.

Regards

surajit


On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]>
wrote:

> For the time being, the following name may be assigned to it, although I
> am not satisfied but without further details it is impossible to clarify
> its status:
> Euphorbia heyneana Spreng. subsp. nilagirica (Miq.) Panigrahi which has
> erect or or ascending habit and the same is an endangered endemic confined
> to the Nilgiri hills of Tamil Nadu.
> Tapas.
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:50 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, Sir, this species (in this thread) is ascending or erect. The
>> problem is cyathium is so small that my camera fails to produce detail.
>> Since it is the flowering time of this species I will try to find it
>> somewhere else so that we can conclude that it is a stunted or deformed
>> state of a certain species.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Surajit,
>>> You need a binocular dissecting microscope.
>>> The other thread is giving the identity of Euphorbia heyneana subsp.
>>> heyneana (syn. E. micorphylla B.Heyne ex Roth).  Your present plant is even
>>> closer to that but in that case the habit is prostrate and a cyathial stalk
>>> present.  Here I see clearly ascending or erect habit and no cyathial stalk
>>> is visible.
>>> Regards,
>>> Tapas.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:48 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sir,
>>>>
>>>> I do not have a simple microscope, have a compound one but do not know
>>>> how to examine an entire flower under it. I will try to examine for more
>>>> features with a magnifying glass and would inform you if I find any.
>>>>
>>>> I request you to please examine and identify one my old thread of a
>>>> different species -
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/Hzw2B7j5APk/OgYwHaTtkKgJ.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much. It is always a learning session under your
>>>> guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> surajit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This small herb seems to be interesting.  It is closely related to
>>>>> Euphorbia serpens, differing in the serrate margins of leaves, rounded to
>>>>> obtuse (rather than retuse) at apex.  I do not see the root primordia at
>>>>> the nodes which are usually present in E. serpens.  Further differences, 
>>>>> if
>>>>> any, can be ascertained by examining the flowers and fruits under a
>>>>> microscope.
>>>>> Superficially similar to E. cristata in its foliage but the whole
>>>>> plant (habit) is much smaller. with smaller, glabrous leaves, trinerved at
>>>>> base.
>>>>> Further critical studies are therefore very desirable to establish its
>>>>> status.
>>>>> Tapas.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:16 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was also thinking of stunted growth, a stunted form of *Euphorbia
>>>>>> thymifolia* L.?  Anurag or Dinesh Ji's threads are so different
>>>>>> looking. that I thought it must be some other species.
>>>>>> In fact I failed to find any particular feature in my photographs.
>>>>>> Instead, I searched matching images and discarded *E. granulata*,
>>>>>> came across the similar looking image of *E. cristata* in
>>>>>> 'indiabiodiversity' site!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> surajit koley
>>>>>> a *non-botanist* member of
>>>>>> efloraofIndia google group
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please check whether it can be a form with stunted growth.
>>>>>>> Your link leads on to Euphorbia cristata which it is not and the
>>>>>>> same has not been recorded from West Bengal so far.
>>>>>>> I can not think of any other genus.
>>>>>>> Tapas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:02 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Today I have photographed a few shot of the species again, one or
>>>>>>>> two individual, each within 3 cm height is erect as can be seen in the
>>>>>>>> first photograph. But the community (my assumption, I didn't disturb 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> herb) is decumbent aqs can be seen in the 2nd image.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I also attach herewith cropped part of two original pictures for
>>>>>>>> the highest detail my camera could take.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The herb is growing in sandy soil, produced by debris of building
>>>>>>>> materials like sand, concrete dust, small gravels etc. But the place is
>>>>>>>> always damp.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> surajit koley
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From the photographs it appears that the plant is erect and
>>>>>>>>> ascending and not prostrate or procumbent. Please confirm this point. 
>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>> will soon comment on it.  I am awaiting reply of Balakrishnan Sir.
>>>>>>>>> In the mean time please take good photographs, collect a sample
>>>>>>>>> and press and dry it up in a news paper or blotter in such a manner 
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> both surfaces of the leaves are visible.
>>>>>>>>> Tapas.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:04 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Noticed this small herb beside our kitchen drainage. There are 3
>>>>>>>>>> or 4 individual of this species, each having around 3 to 4 cm length.
>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately the other camera I have is now out-of-order!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I regret bad picture quality, but the plant itself has tiny
>>>>>>>>>> flower and fruit. The features are, as far as I can make out of the
>>>>>>>>>> attached photographs, (i) opposite sub-sessile leaves (ii) leaves 
>>>>>>>>>> are about
>>>>>>>>>> 5mm in length (iii) leaf apex serrate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks similar to
>>>>>>>>>> http://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/245933?sa=X&ved=0CBcQ9QEwAWoVChMI2eD7vIb5xgIVQYyUCh37Vgq6
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any probability?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> surajit koley
>>>>>>>>>> a *non-botanist* member of
>>>>>>>>>> efloraofIndia google group
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to