Thanks, Rawat ji.
Pl. see if it's OK ?:
https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species


On 1 September 2015 at 18:51, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, Rawat ji.
> These are wonderful suggestions. I will certainly do the needful.
> Members are requested to give their feedback and suggestions.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "D.S Rawat" <[email protected]>
> Date: 1 Sep 2015 17:48
> Subject: Suggestions regarding few minor changes in eFI
> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>
> Cc:
>
> Garg Ji
>
> We have been following The Plant List 2013 in eFI and accordingly
> recognize families as per APG-III (adopted in TPL2013).
>
> Today, while trying to see how many families we have in eFI, I found few
> families/ genera in the places which are not according to TPL2013. These
> are given below with their position as per TPL2013:
>
>    1. Chenopodiaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore,
>    its genera (Arthrocnemum
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/c/chenopodiaceae/arthrocnemum>
>    Salsola
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/c/chenopodiaceae/salsola>
>    Suaeda
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/c/chenopodiaceae/suaeda>)
>    need to be shifted in Amaranthaceae.
>    2. Cochlospermaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore,
>    genus Cochlospermum with all its species (Cochlospermum religiosum ?
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cochlospermaceae/cochlospermum/cochlospermum-religiosum-1>
>  Cochlospermum
>    religiosum
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cochlospermaceae/cochlospermum/cochlospermum-religiosum>
>  Cochlospermum
>    species
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cochlospermaceae/cochlospermum/cochlospermum-species>
>  Cochlospermum
>    vitifolium
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cochlospermaceae/cochlospermum/cochlospermum-vitifolium>
>    ) need to be shifted to Bixaceae.
>    3. Dipsacaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore, the
>    genus Dipsacus
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/d/dipsacaceae/dipsacus>
>    need to be shifted to Caprifoliaceae.
>    4. Limnocharitaceae is not recognized as distinct family; therefore,
>    genus Limnocharis
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/l/limnocharitaceae/limnocharis-flava>
>    need to be shifted to Alismataceae.
>    5. Morinaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore, genus
>    Morina
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/m/morinaceae/morina>
>    need to be shifted to Caprifoliaceae.
>    6. Stackhousiaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore,
>    genus Stackhousia
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/s/stackhousiaceae/stackhousia>
>    need to be shifted to Celastraceae.
>    7. Valerianaceae is not recognized as a distinct family; therefore,
>    genus Valeriana
>    
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/v/valerianaceae/valeriana>
>    need to be shifted to Caprifoliaceae.
>    8. Eutrema
>    <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/b/eutrema>
>    need to be shifted to Brassicaceae.
>
>
>
> These changes (except Eutrema) are essential only when we follow TPL2013.
>
> One more suggestion:
>
> Can we list all Angiosperm (Flowering plants) families on a single page in
> A-Z sequence to reach to families in single click rather than clicking few
> times?  It will be easier to reach to any family. Both systems can be
> kept here.
>
> The entire list (copied from eFI) with links is a small word document of
> 17.6 KB. I am attaching it here.
>
> If you feel it appropriate this mail of mine may be posted to efibest for
> the opinion of others.
>
> Regards.
>
> DSRawat Pantnagar
> Dr D.S.Rawat
> Department of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &
> Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA
>
>


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
The whole world uses my Image Resource
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
(arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
world- more than 2500 members & 2,25,000 messages on 18.6.15) or Efloraofindia
website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
database of more than 11,000 species & 2,00,000 images). Winner of
Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
<https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
India'.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to