Thanks a lot Rawat Ji for valuable input, I take this as *Sorbus cuspidata* ...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:21 PM, D.S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on leaves Sorbus lanata and S.cuspidata are differentiated as: > Leaves lobulate.....................S.lanata > Leaves not lobulate................S. cuspidata > as differentiated in Osmaston (1927) A Forest Flora for Kumaon. > Leaves are not lobulate in this case and thus point toward S. cuspidata. > The plant uploaded by Manoj Chandran Ji have lobulate leaves and goes to > S.lanata. > Supplement to Flowers of the Himalaya by A.Stainton has images of both > species (plate34). > DSRawat Pantnagar > > > On Friday, September 14, 2012 at 7:31:52 AM UTC+5:30, Nidhan Singh wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> This is the same tree Balkar Ji have recently uploaded, identity is >> unresolved....have a look at these pics too...definitely looks like a >> Rosaceae member as has been narrowed down by Gurcharan sir... >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Dr. Nidhan Singh >> Department of Botany >> I.B. (PG) College >> Panipat-132103 Haryana >> Ph.: 09416371227 >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Regards, Dr. Nidhan Singh Assistant Professor Department of Botany I.B. (PG) College Panipat-132103 Haryana Ph.: 09416371227 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
