I have checked with `Gamble`-this is nearer to `Tephrosia procumbense.` pl validate. ushaprabha.
On 21 October 2015 at 00:30, ushaprabha page <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Vijayji. > I will check. > > On 20 October 2015 at 19:39, Vijayasankar Raman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Tephrosia pumila, perhaps. >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:45 AM, ushaprabha page < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Id pl of the Tephrosia sp. >>> photos from Varhad and Khandesh. >>> (Its not T.candida which has 17 to25 foliates. >>> >>> ushaprabha. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Vijayasankar >> >> ------------------------------------------ >> Vijayasankar Raman >> Research Scientist >> National Center for Natural Products Research >> University of Mississippi, USA >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
