Thanks, Chadwell ji On 13 Nov 2016 8:04 pm, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Will need to check this out further to be sure but can state that it is > definitely not Gentiana tubiflora which is not recorded from Ladakh (which > borders Chandertal Lake) and is not to be expected in Lahoul. Yes, this > species is included in 'Flora of Lahaul-Spiti' but incorrectly so as this > is yet another record from the Kulu Valley side (or very top) of Rohtang > (where I have seen it myself) *which should not be included in a Flora of > Lahaul-Spiti* (would be a much thinner volume if all the Rohtang records > were removed. > > On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 5:09:31 PM UTC+1, Prashant wrote: >> >> Dear Friends, >> This looks like Gentiana sp. Photographed just at the periphery of >> Chandratal Lake (Spiti). >> >> Date/Time: 30-09-2010 / 08:40AM >> Location: In the vicinity of Chandratal Lake (Spiti) at the altitude of >> approx. 14200ft. >> Habitat: Wild >> Plant Habit: Herb >> >> regards >> Prashant >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
