>From the fruits and leaves it appeared to me to be Lauraceae which it is not as the number of stamens in Lauraceae rarely exceed 9 in number.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > Tried all Lauraceae listed in Nepal but could not come to the conclusion. > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:56 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji >> >> On 16 Nov 2016 12:10 am, "Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Members, >>> >>> Location: Champadevi, Nepal >>> Altitude: 6000 ft. >>> Date: 12 November 2016 >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
