Thanks, Chadwell ji On 21 Nov 2016 12:46 am, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Well done Ashwini, you have photographed *both* S.moorcroftiana and > S.parnassifolia in HP - which means that 'Flowers of Himalaya' is incorrect > in the > distribution of the latter species. > > On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 9:51:09 AM UTC+1, ashwini wrote: > >> Found a couple of plants of this Saxifrage at 3200 and above. The red >> dots on the petals are conspicuous. The habit and leaves (smaller) are >> similar to *S. parnassifolia*. Could this be *S. moorcroftiana*? >> >> *Saxifraga moorcroftaiana*—Moorcroft's Saxifrage? >> Above Triund, HP >> 3100m >> 03-04 September 2016 >> >> Thanks. >> Ashwini >> >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
