Dear Tabish,

Putting here some references from archives:
1) http://www.archive.org/stream/floraofpresidenc01cook#page/n629/mode/2up...
Theodore Cooke's Flora of the Presidency of Bombay, Vol I Part III
2) http://www.archive.org/stream/matheranhillits00unkngoog#page/n43/mode/2up...
J Y Smith's Matheran Hill, Its People, Plants and Animals
3)
http://www.archive.org/stream/bombayfloraorsho00dalzrich#page/222/mode/2up...
The Bombay Flora by Dalzell and Gibson


Shrikant ji, please help on *P. crassicaulis.

*Regards*.


*


On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:

> According to Kew World Checklist (which I treat as an authority) both
> Pavetta crassicaulis Bremek. and Pavetta indica L. are accepted name,
> meaning they are two distinct species.
> 1. Pavetta crassicaulis Bremek., (accepted name)
>    Synonym: Pavetta stocksii Bremek.
> 2. Pavetta indica L. (accepted name)
>   Synonyms:
>     Ixora pavetta Roxb., Fl. Ind. 1: 385 (1820), nom. illeg.
>     Ixora indica (L.) Baill., Hist. Pl. 7: 278 (1880).
>     Pavetta indica var. typica Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 89: 623 (1929),
> nom. inval.
>     Pavetta indica var. glabra Bremek., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg.
> 37: 119 (1934), nom. inval.
>  Any new light on this issue is welcome!
>    - Tabish (confused)
>
> On Mar 29, 2:41 pm, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ... yes ... me too confused with these two names ... however settled with
> *P.
> > crassicaulis* athttp://
> gallery.bizhat.com/showphoto.php/photo/36569(representing<http://gallery.bizhat.com/showphoto.php/photo/36569%28representing>
> > Ingalhalikar ji's FOS).
> > Best would be to check into British and Maharashtra flora ... will revert
> > with my observations.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Is it different from Pavetta indica, or is there a naming confusion?
> > > GRIN has Pavetta indica in its database, but Pavetta crassicaulis is
> > > missing. IPNI has both, but with no connection between the two.
> > >   - Tabish
> >
> > > On Mar 29, 11:24 am, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > ... strongly believing it to be *Pavetta crassicaulis* locally known
> as *
> > > > papat* OR *papti*.
> > > > Regards.
> >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Parjanya guru <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> >
> > > > > Dear Aarti.. seems  to be*  Ixora..*  may be*  Pavetta*  too..
> > > > >  but.. please add inforamation on presence of  stipules..  and add
> some
> > > > > pics of leaves too...
> >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Aarti S. Khale <
> > > [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > >>  *Date/Time* : 17th of April, 2009/ 10.09 am
> > > > >> *Location Place* : Mahabaleshwar,Maharashtra... *Altitude* :  ...
> > > *GPS*:
> > > > >> *Habitat* : Wild ... *Type* :
> > > > >> *Plant Habit* : Shrub ... *Height *: about 3-4 feet ... *Length* :
> ...
> > > > >> *Leaves Type *:  ... *Shape* :  ... *Size* : ...
> > > > >> *Inflorescence Type* :  ... *Size* :
> > > > >> *Flowers Size* : about 1 inch ... *Colour* : white ... *Calyx* :
>  ...
> > > *
> > > > >> Bracts* : ...
> > > > >> *Fruits Type* :  ... *Shape *:  ... *Size* :  ... *Seeds* :
> >
> > > > >> *Other Info* :
> > > > >> *Fragrance* :  ...  *Pollinator* :  ...  *Uses* :
> >
> > > > >> Is it a type of Ixora?
> > > > >> Aarti
> >
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > >> "efloraofindia" group.
> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> >
> > > <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
> >
> > > > >  --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > > "efloraofindia" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> >
> > > <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > > > > .
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "efloraofindia" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> <indiantreepix%[email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

Reply via email to