At the present time, I consider this does come within what I understand to be Rosa macrophylla. Dr Singh is correct that confusion with some forms of Rosa webbiana exists.
On Monday, October 3, 2011 at 8:32:15 AM UTC+1, Dinesh Valke wrote: > *Rosa macrophylla * Lindl. > > > - *RO-zuh* -- referring to the rose genus, or the color > *mak-roh-FIL-uh* -- large leaf > > > [image: Rosa macrophylla] > <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F2560637508%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzc2-r6NHYnuakr0QVztiOWnlb-aGA> > > May 31, 2008 ... Manali, Himachal Pradesh > > > > *commonly known as*: Himalayan rose, big hip rose > > *Native to*: Himalayas (2400 - 3700 m) > > > Regards. > Dinesh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
