Thanks for your input Basant.
Dickore & Klimes (2005) do not list Rosa macrophylla from Ladakh.   They list 
R.webbiana, tuschetica,oxyodon, multiflora.   The latter, I understand to be a 
double pink introduced from China or Japan.  Stewartdid not list either 
R.oxyodon or R.tuschetica.
What about Rosa oxyodon - which pressed specimens of and some of the photos 
available on the internet (bearing in mind they may or may not be correctly 
identified) are close to the form of what I understand tobe R.macrophylla?   
Need to look into this further.
Have any other group members heard of Rosa oxyodon in Ladakh?
Much the same applies to Rosa tuschetica.....   These roses are known from such 
places as Georgia.
I have seen material above Khoksar in Lahoul that I HAD considered to be within 
R.macrophyllabut have thought most of the material I have come across or seen 
photos of in Ladakh as coming withinRosa webbiana.
It would be informative if we were able to obtain the thoughts of a Rosa 
specialist as to how 'critical'or not the genus is in the Himalaya?
ASSUMING that the identifications of R.oxyodon and R.tuschetica are correct 
will be an example the DANGERSof always attempting to FIT a plant seen into the 
EXISTING species recorded in a region.

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: Basant Ballabh <[email protected]>
 To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
 Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017, 10:57
 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:261745] Re: Rosaceae week- Rosa webbiana
   


On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 9:34:22 AM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote:
Thanks, Chadwell ji.
On 16 January 2017 at 22:59, chrischa...@btinternet. com 
<chrischa...@btinternet. com> wrote:

I am in agreement that this rose approaches Rosa macrophylla.   Clearly, some 
forms of Rosa webbiana and some xerophytic forms ofR.macrophylla are difficult 
to tell apart.

On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 3:11:04 PM UTC+1, Prashant wrote:
Dear Friends,

Sharing Photographs of Rosa webbiana  (Got to see both flowers and fruits).

Location: Hemis Monastory, Ladakh

Date/Time: 15-09-2011 / 03:30PM

Habitat: Wild

Plant habit: Shrub.

Regards
Prashant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepi...@ googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.




-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg'Creating awareness of IndianFlora & Fauna'Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow 
Awards 2014 for efloraofindia. 
For identification,learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please 
visit/ joinour EfloraofindiaGoogle e-group (largestin the world- around 2700 
members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) orEfloraofindia website (with a species 
database of more than11,000 species & 2,20,000 images). The whole world uses my 
Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of 
Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can 
also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each 
image.Also author of 'APhotoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of 
India'. 


Thanks & regards to one and all. 

I have gone through different comments posted by the authors. As flower colour 
appears white in the centre and presence of many number of red rose hips and 
its size the species resemble to Rosa webbiana only. However I am unable to 
confirm it with my present available records. Rosa macrophylla is not very 
common in Ladakh and reported in the lower altitudes only but Rosa webbiana is 
abundantly found in Nubra, Suru (Kargil) and Leh valleys upto higher reaches.  
Rosa webbiana is also reported with dropping prickly branched bush while R. 
macrophylla is tall shrub with long thorn. I am also agree with Chris Chadwell 
Ji that R. webbiana and high altitude forms of R. macrophylla can not be easily 
distinguished and only with pictures it is more difficult.

Thanks 
Basant  
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/xKXC9JAwo0k/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
[email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to