Thanks, Saroj ji. On 21 Jun 2017 7:13 p.m., "Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> wrote:
It may be cultivated. Looking in the google I guess it is Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth . Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Girish ji. > I also agree as far as leaves are concerned. I have not seen the fruits. > Was it cultivated or planted? > > On 21 Jun 2017 10:31 a.m., "girish kumar ellezhuthil" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Looks like Tecoma stans.... >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
