No. It is otherwise. On 22-Aug-2017 11:18 PM, "Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> wrote:
> That means I. tripetala is correct ID ? > > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:58 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> He gave some reply in Sawmliana ji's post today- by confirming Tabish ji >> belief without any further id. >> >> On 22-Aug-2017 9:24 PM, "Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear Mr. Garg, >> >> Could we get some guidance from Dr. Gogoi ? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Further investigation please. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> Forwarded conversation >>> >>> Subject: SK613 03 JUL-2017:ID >>> ------------------------ >>> >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Date: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:26 PM >>> >>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, "J.M. Garg" < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Dear Members, >>> >>> Location: Soureni, Mirik, India >>> Date: 18 May 2017 >>> Altitude: 4200 ft. >>> >>> Impatiens ... ?? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:52 AM >>> To: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Pl. Check comparative images in efi >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:54 AM >>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Beautiful images. >>> Pl. Also check comparative images in efi site. >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: Wojciech Adamowski <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:29 PM >>> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>, efloraofindia < >>> [email protected]> >>> Cc: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> This one is most probably I. tripetala, as flowers are in fascicles. >>> Frontal view of flower could help. >>> Best regards Wojciech >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:36 PM >>> To: Wojciech Adamowski <[email protected]> >>> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, Saroj Kasaju < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Wojciech ji. >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:05 PM >>> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < >>> [email protected]>, Tabish <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Wojciech Adamowski <[email protected]>, efloraofindia < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Thank you Mr. Adamowski. >>> >>> Impatiens tripetala Roxb. >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM >>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Tabish <[email protected]>, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Wojciech ji. >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Wojciech Adamowski" <[email protected]> >>> Date: 31-Jul-2017 6:39 PM >>> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: SK613 03 JUL-2017:ID >>> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> >>> Unfortunately at the moment I don't have enough time and resources to >>> dig deeper. >>> I am still working in the field and I also got several interesting, but >>> time consuming requests dealing with balsams. >>> This way problem I. tripetala or no need to wait for more time and this >>> could be somewhere in winter... >>> I will try to resolve simple cases in meantime. >>> Best regards Wojciech >>> >>> >>> 6:31 poniedziałek, 2017-7-31, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> napisał(a): >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Tabish" <[email protected]> >>> Date: 30-Jul-2017 12:30 AM >>> Subject: Re: SK613 03 JUL-2017:ID >>> To: "efloraofindia" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: <[email protected]>, "Tabish" <[email protected]> >>> >>> In my opinion, neither this specimen by Saroj Kasaju nor the specimen by >>> M.Sawmliana from Mizoram are *Impatiens tripetala*. I have attached the >>> description from Flora of British India, and underlined the portion >>> describing the lip and spur. The spur cannot be called short in any of the >>> two specimens. I have also attached the picture of lectotype of *Impatiens >>> tripetala* from Phytotaxa 288 (2): 193–196 (2016). Neither of the two >>> specimens appear close to it. >>> Best wishes >>> Tabish >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:58 PM >>> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>, Wojciech Adamowski < >>> [email protected]> >>> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, Tabish < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
