This can go with Spondias pinnata /Spondias mangifera a close up of flowers shud confirm.
On Apr 17, 11:03 am, Muthu Karthick <[email protected]> wrote: > Dineshji, > More possibilities for Anacardiaceae. > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Neil ji, to me does not look like *G. pinnata*, because here, the > > inflorescence stalk is pink, with buds (or flowers) of red tinted white > > colour, they are smaller at the end of panicles and are clinging close to > > the stalk ... whereas in *G. pinnata* the stalk is light green, the much > > branched pinnacle has its buds and flowers diverging from the stalks. > > > Regards. > > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Neil Soares <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Hi Dinesh, > >> My apologies for the slip-up. I meant Kakad [Garuga pinnata]. Sending > >> you some of my of photographs to prove my point. > >> Regards, > >> Neil. > > >> --- On *Sat, 4/17/10, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>* wrote: > > >> From: Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:32434] DV - 14APR10 - 0138 :: ¿ Spondias > >> acuminata ? > >> To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]> > >> Cc: "efloraofindia" <[email protected] > >> Date: Saturday, April 17, 2010, 8:02 AM > > >> But Neil ji, have always felt that the inflorecence of *L. > >> coromandelica*is wiry bunch of strands ... each of them is unbranched, > >> some of them > >> drooping too. > >> Have a feeling that this plant is not *L. coromandelica*. > > >> Regards. > >> ' > > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Neil Soares > >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > > >>> Hi Dinesh, > >>> It looks like Moi [Llanea coromandalica] just getting ready to fruit. > >>> Regards, > >>> Neil. > > >>> --- On *Fri, 4/16/10, Dinesh Valke > >>> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > >>> >* wrote: > > >>> From: Dinesh Valke > >>> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > > >>> Subject: [efloraofindia:32434] DV - 14APR10 - 0138 :: ¿ Spondias > >>> acuminata ? > >>> To: "efloraofindia" > >>> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=indiantree...@googlegrou...> > > >>> Date: Friday, April 16, 2010, 11:27 PM > > >>> Dear friends, > >>> Could provide very scant information; the leafless tree in far distance > >>> attracted me due to its cream-coloured inflorescence. > >>> The photos too may not provide much clues to ID; yet hoping to get some > >>> info. > > >>> Date/Time : April 14, 2010 at 1.38pm IST > >>> Location Place : Palghar Road (Ghat section) > > >>> Altitude : 82 m > >>> GPS : 19°42'0.75"N, 72°49'17.99"E > > >>> Habitat : wild > >>> Type : mixed deciduous forest > > >>> Plant > >>> Habit : medium sized deciduous tree > >>> Height : 15 - 20 ft > >>> Length : - not a climber - > > >>> Leaves > >>> Type : do not know > >>> Shape : do not know > >>> Size : do not know > > >>> Inflorescence > >>> Type : panicle > >>> Size : can not guess > > >>> Flowers > >>> Size : can not guess > >>> Colour : off-white > >>> Calyx : do not know > >>> Bracts : - no bracts - > > >>> Fruits > >>> Type : do not know > >>> Shape : do not know > >>> Size : do not know > >>> Seeds : do not know > > >>> Other Info > >>> Fragrance : do not know > >>> Pollinator : do not know > >>> Uses : do not know > > >>> Thoughts exchanged between Satish (Pardeshi) ji and me at Google Buzz put > >>> here: > > >>> x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x > >>> x x x x x x x x > >>> satish pardeshi - first two pic look like that of *Spondias*!!! > > >>> Dinesh Valke - yes !!! ... many thanks, Satish ji. > > >>> satish pardeshi - Palghar is really nice place, i have been there a few > >>> times... the estuary, the beaches, the forest on the hills along the > >>> highway, the water bodies and the wadis of the local people for growing > >>> vegetables and fruit... all is really nice. > > >>> Dinesh Valke - Satish ji ... on second thoughts ... slightly not > >>> confident about the plant being *S. pinnata*. > >>> Have got few views of *S. pinnata* seen at Yeoor Hills and near Revdanda > >>> ... > >>>http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Spondiaspinnata&w=91314344%40N00&m=tags > > >>> The inflorescence in my earlier views, seem to be wiry and relatively > >>> longer and much more branched. > > >>> Your thoughts please. > > >>> satish pardeshi - Yes Dinesh ji > >>> it is different from ur pics at flicr...i am pretty sure this is of * > >>> Spondias* species. > > >>> Dinesh Valke - Cooke's Flora of Bombay describes two species: *S. > >>> mangifera* ( syn. of *S. pinnata* ) and lesser known *S. acuminata*. > > >>> Key described: > >>> Panicle 12 - 15 in. long; stone rough ................................. > >>> *S. mangifera* > >>> Panicle 6 - 8 in. long; stone smooth .................................. > >>> *S. acuminata* > > >>> Another difference found in the descriptions: > >>> *S. mangifera*: > >>> ... bark smooth, ash coloured, branches nearly horizontal; > >>> ... leaflets 3 - 5 pairs and a terminal one ... > > >>> *S. acuminata*: > >>> ... bark smooth, olive-grey; branches spreading in all directions from > >>> erecto-patent above to divaricate below > >>> ... leaflets 5 - 8 pairs (and a terminal one) ... > > >>> BUT the book mentions that existence of *S. acuminata* in Bombay > >>> Presidency is somewhat doubtful, ... Cooke had seen one imperfect specimen > >>> from the hills of Kanheri, not differing from *S. mangifera* !! > > >>> Satish ji, do you think this plant to be *S. acuminata* OR yet some > >>> other species of *Spondias* ? > > >>> Many thanks. > > >>> x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x > >>> x x x x x x x x > > >>> Regards. > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "efloraofindia" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=indiantree...@googlegrou...> > >>> . > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=indiantreepix%2Bunsubscr...> > >>> . > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "efloraofindia" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<indiantreepix%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > > -- > Muthu Karthick, N > Junior Research Fellow > Care Earth Trust > Chennai - 61www.careearthtrust.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
