Thanks, Chris ji.

On 21-Nov-2017 5:53 PM, "[email protected]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Dr Sabu
>
> You say that there are 4 species of *Zingiber* with identical 'fruits'
> but do not tell us which ones.  Would you kindly do so, along with their
> known geographic and
> altitudinal ranges and how to distinguish between them when in flower?
>
> I cannot find 4 candidate species of this genus from the Himalayan
> foothills but my references, at the very best, are decades out-of-date.  I
> have seen in Nepal, what I took to be *Z.chrysanthum* Roscoe, which looks
> similar to the specimen Ratnakar collected near Shimla.  Note that this
> species was known to Hooker in his FBI - where a distribution from Kumaon
> to Sikkim was given.  In the Supplement to 'Flowers of the Himalaya',
> authored (with its publication privately funded alone) by the late Adam
> Stainton who devoted decades to studying Himalayan flora; he was a man of
> 'independent' means financially, having inherited money.  Whilst mentioning
> this, all members of efi should be grateful for his efforts but it is time
> to realise that the widespread belief that *every* Britisher is a
> millionaire is incorrect - the truth is that many struggle financially.
> Anyhow, in Stainton's book published in 1997, there is a photo and brief
> description of *Zingiber chrysanthum* - he gives a distribution of
> Uttarakund to Sikkim @ 450-1600m.  So specimens found near Shimla would
> represent an extension of its range.  *But what of these other, similar
> species, which I know nothing about?  *There is no mention of this
> *Z.chrysanthum* in Collet's 'Flora Simlensis'.
>
> *There seems to be some confusion as to what part of the plant was
> collected by Ratnakar.  Stainton says Z.chrysanthum has flowers in dense
> globose or oblong heads direct from the tuberous rootstock.  Corolla-tube
> 3.75-5cm long; segments bright red, lanceolate; lip bright yellow, deeply
> 5-lobed.  The capsules are bright red, oblong, splitting open when ripe (as
> has happened in the specimen photographed above); the seed is as large as a
> pea, globose, with a white translucent aril.  Stainton records it as
> flowering in August, fruiting in October.  In Ratnakar's photo you can see
> the seeds in the whitish fleshy covering.  It is not uncommon for the
> foliage of plants to partly or fully "rot away" leaving on the fruits/seeds
> - which can lead to confusion or difficulty with identification.  This
> happens e.g. with some species of Arisaema and this Zingiber.*
>
> *Another important lesson to learn from this example is the need to go
> exploring for plants in the late autumn and early winter months, as we need
> to understand and familiarise ourselves not just with the flowers of a
> plant species but its fruits and seeds.*
>
> Clearly, all genera in the Zingiberaceae family are in need of further
> study in India (and elsewhere).  May I repeat my request for *more* and
> better close-up, in focus photos to be taken per plant encountered. This
> applies to ALL families and genera of plants.  Sometimes, a species is
> distinctive enough to be identified from a single non-close-up image but
> *often* that is not the case.  For further advice see:
> https://sites.google.com/a/shpa.org.uk/fowh/
>
> Traditionally, plants were identified using dried, pressed specimens in
> herbaria (the worse the weather, the more difficult it is to collect, dry
> and pressed specimens for herbaria) - now members of efI have the
> opportunity of photographing (year round) India's flora in close-up,
> providing details and information not available in the past.  The weather
> or temperature may not be as favourable later in the year but well worth
> the effort/discomfort.  Presumably, the reason *Zingiber chrysanthum* was
> missed in forest near Shimla in the past was not that it did not grow there
> but that few, if any, botanists ventured out there at that time of the
> year - so my compliments to Ratnakar for exploring at this time of the
> year.  May I encourage him to undertake more field work - though be sure to
> take more photos.
>
> On Monday, November 20, 2017 at 4:52:59 AM UTC, ratnakar tripathy wrote:
>
>>
>> *Dear All,*
>>
>> *Kindly help me identify this plant taken intact from a forest near
>> Shimla. the photo is attached. it is not just a flower but a plant rooted
>> in the soil. Google image search came up with 'pepper' in italian. 😄*
>> *ratnakar*
>> Fellow,
>> Indian Institute of Advanced Studies [IIAS], Shimla 171005
>> ph: 0177 2830348
>>
>>
>>
>> (Personal Mobile: +91-9608223908/8988871591)
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to