However, the last Paragraph of the paper has been presented in very aggressive mode which is not desirable. One should maintain minimum ethics while presenting a paper. The authors possibly forgot their own misgivings. They described a new species in 2015 (*Nordic Journal of Botany* 33: 38. 2015) which got merged in the same year (*Journal of Economic & Taxonomic Botany *39: 556. 2015).
Thanks and regards, Tapas. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:40 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > I have gone through it. Very interesting. > > On 02-Feb-2018 3:49 PM, "Tapas Chakrabarty" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I came across the attached publication on the above subject which >> clarifies some of the confusions in the Indian Cycads. This paper appears >> to be a very valuable contribution. >> >> Thanking you. >> >> Tapas Chakrabarty. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
