Yes, we have to treat Campanula cana as a syn. of Campanula pallida as per Flora Similensis.
On Mon 23 Apr, 2018, 10:36 AM Anil Thakur, <[email protected]> wrote: > Garg ji > This is the same plant which I had posted as Campanula cana and we > discussed yesterday. In view of the account given by Prof. Mangleshwar > Sharma ji of Punjabi University, Patiala in Gloria of Chamba, it should be > C. pallida. > > But the link provided by you from Flores of China and flora.org are > acting to the confusion. > > Rdgards > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
