detailed explanation
thanks, Tapasda
usha di

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 4:27 PM Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Gangopadhyay & Chakrabarty (1993) reduced *Combretum flagrocarpus *C.B.
> Clarke to a variety of *C. wallichii *DC. However, Chakrabarty & Chauhan
> (J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 28: 126-127. 2004) wrote: "Gangopadhyay & Chakrabarty
> (1993, 1997) applied a rather wide concept while treating *C. wallichii *by
> reducing four well established species viz. *C. flagrocarpum *Clarke, *C.
> griffithii *Heurck & Mull.Arg., *C. porterianum *(Wall. ex C.B. Clarke)
> Craib and *C. yunnanense *Exell as its varieties. They also proposed a
> new variety, var. *deciduum , *under *C. wallichii. *It appears that the
> superficially similar foliage and the difficulty in identifying the
> incomplete materials of the taxa under discussion possibly prompted
> Gangopadhyay & Chakrabarty to make such drastic reductions. However, the
> present studies reveal that *C. wallichii *in its present state (i.e.
> sensu Gangopadhyay & Chakrabarty, 1993) represents a heterogeneous
> assemblage and in fact six closely related species are involved in it
> rather than varieties with clear-cut differences from each another without
> any intergradations. Hence it seems appropriate and convenient to remove
> all the varieties from *C. wallichii *and reinstate or raise them to
> specific ranks, following the traditional treatments...."
> Here, Chakrabarty & Chauhan (2004) then reinstated *Combretum
> flagrocarpum *C.B. Clarke and clarified that it can be distinguished from *C.
> wallichii *in being pubescent and in the absence of tufts of yellow hairs
> or domatia on the lower nerve-axils on the undersurface of the leaves.
> Now the present images show dense linear-subulate persistent processes on
> the main body of the fruits which point to *C. wallichii *as well as *C.
> flagrocarpum.  *However, as the nature of pubescence is not clear in the
> images (whether pubescent or glabrous) as well as whether the lower surface
> of the leaves bearing domatia in the lower nerve axils.  In any case, in
> its present concept, *Combretum wallichii *is endemic to Nepal and *C.
> flagrocarpum * is distributed in Bhutan, NE India, Bangladesh and Myanmar.
>
> *Conclusion: Combretum flagrocarpus* C.B. Clarke.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:20 AM M Sawmliana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Location : Samthang, Mizoram
>> Date : 02-10-2018
>> Habit : Large straggling shrub
>> Habitat : Wild
>>
>> With regards,
>> M.Sawmliana
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "efloraofindia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Usha di
===========

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to