Thank you Mr. Garg !

Dear Mr. Zala : Mussaenda pubescens and its SYN. are not listed in Nepal.

Saroj Kasaju


On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:09 AM J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Tabish ji.
> To me Saroj ji's plant matches with illustration at
>
> http://plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=6978&SID=0&mobile=0&code_category_taxon=1&size=0
>
> Also matches with the keys between two closely related species from Flora
> of China
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121358>:
>
> 5 (4)
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121358#KEY-1-4> 
> Stems
> sericeous with appressed indument; stipules 5-8 × 4-5 mm; calyx lobes 4-11
> mm.   19 *M. macrophylla*
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333234>
> + Stems villous or hirsute with widely spreading trichomes; stipules 7-10
> × 6-12 mm; calyx lobes 7-18 mm.   29 *M. treutleri*
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333246>
>
> From the keys, it is evident that hairs on stem play a key role in
> differentiating these two closely related species. *Here the stem is
> clearly not sericeous with appressed indument. It appears to be villous.*
>
> Going through Flora of Bhutan also supports this as *calyx lobes appear
> to be closer to filiform and tapering from the base rather than oblong
> oblanceolate or oblong elliptic, tappering from middle. Length of the calyx
> lobes and corolla tube seems to be quite variable as per the measurement
> given- thus there co-relation may not be correct.*
>
> Mussaenda macrophylla is different as per high resolution specimen and
> other posts by Saroj ji:
> https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fcollections.nmnh.si.edu%
> 2Fmedia%2Findex.php%3Firn%3D12167172
> Mussaenda macrophylla
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/N61x1-265-I>
> Mussaenda macrophylla Wall. ??
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/KzICY035d2E>
>
> Flora of China
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333246>
> further states "This species is similar to *Mussaenda macrophylla*, and
> in the protologue *M. treutleri* was explicitly separated from plants
> commonly called *M. macrophylla*, both in the wild and in cultivation; in
> fact, the protologue noted that *M. treutleri* was already widely
> distributed in cultivation at that time incorrectly under the other name. 
> *Mussaenda
> treutleri* subsequently has apparently still been confused with or
> combined with *M. macrophylla*, including by recent authors (e.g.,
> Springate et al., Fl. Bhutan 2(2): 783. 1999). *Mussaenda treutleri* is
> here circumscribed somewhat differently than by H. H. Hsue and H. Wu (in
> FRPS 71(1): 301. 1999): the plants from montane Yunnan and adjacent regions
> with broad, generally persistent stipules were separated by Stapf from *M.
> macrophylla* and included in *M. treutleri*, and this distinction is
> followed here."
>
>
>
>
> On 9 August 2018 at 23:55, Tabish <tabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There seems to be some discrepancy in the description of Mussaenda
>> treutleri at FOC and elsewhere.
>> According to Bhutan Biodiversity Portal
>> <https://biodiversity.bt/species/show/6300>, the sepals of Mussaenda
>> treutleri are described as:
>> " Calyx lobes filiform, tappering from base, 4-8 x 1mm, pilose. Corolla
>> tube 1.6-3.2cm, distinctly widened upwards, sparsely pilose;"
>> sepals of Mussaenda macrophylla
>> <https://biodiversity.bt/species/show/6299>are described as
>> "Calyx lobes oblong oblanceolate or oblong elliptic, tappering from
>> middle, 7-15 x 1-3mm, pilose. Corolla tube 2-2.8cm, pilose upwards"
>> At India Biodiversity Portal
>> <https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/244658>, the calyx lobes of
>> M. treutleri are described as
>> "Calyx lobes to 1 cm long, linear-lanceolate"
>>  I differentiated the two species based on the length of sepals compared
>> to that of flower-tube. Going by the above description, the sepals of 
>> Mussaenda
>> treutleriare much smaller than the flower-tube and very narrow. Sepals of
>> M. macrophylla are larger (less than about half the flower-tube) and
>> broader.
>>  Based on the above, I would assume that this plant is Mussaenda
>> macrophylla.
>> FOC
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333246>described
>> sepals of M. treutleri as "lobes lanceolate, ligulate, or oblanceolate,
>> 7-18 × 3-4 mm" 1.8 cm sepal length looks much larger than that in the
>> other two descriptions.
>>    Tabish
>> -------------------------------------------
>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:48 PM J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I also agree with Shrikant ji for *Mussaenda treutleri *as per
>>>
>>> http://plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=6978&SID=0&mobile=0&code_category_taxon=1&size=0
>>> http://www.saintlucianplants.com/cultivated/musstreu/musstreu.html
>>>
>>> Here are the keys between two closely related species from Flora of
>>> China
>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121358>:
>>>
>>> 5 (4)
>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121358#KEY-1-4> 
>>> Stems
>>> sericeous with appressed indument; stipules 5-8 × 4-5 mm; calyx lobes 4-11
>>> mm.   19 *M. macrophylla*
>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333234>
>>> + Stems villous or hirsute with widely spreading trichomes; stipules
>>> 7-10 × 6-12 mm; calyx lobes 7-18 mm.   29 *M. treutleri*
>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242333246>
>>>
>>>
>>> Images in Flowers of India
>>> <https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Treutler%27s%20Mussaenda.html>
>>> looks different and may be of some other species.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <kasajusa...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 26 July 2018 at 15:55
>>> Subject: SK1322 26 JUL 2018
>>> To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>, "J.M. Garg" <
>>> jmga...@gmail.com>, Anil Thakur <anilthakur2...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Members,
>>>
>>> Location: Osho, Balaju, Raniban' Nepal
>>> Altitude : 4600 ft.
>>> Date: 7 June 2018
>>> Habit : Wild
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Saroj Kasaju
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>
>>> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
>>>
>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian
>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
>>> world- more than 2975 members & 3,00,000 messages on 25.7.18) or 
>>> Efloraofindia
>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
>>> database of more than 12,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which 1,00,000
>>> are directly displayed).
>>>
>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
>>> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
>>> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
>>> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>>>
>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
>>> India'.
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
>
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- more than 2975 members & 3,00,000 messages on 25.7.18) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 12,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which 1,00,000
> are directly displayed).
>
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to